Understanding the Hair Follicle Drug Test: A Guide to Passing or Preparing
Hair follicle drug testing detects drug use by looking for chemicals in hair samples. These tests are susceptible and able to spot drug use from months back. There are ways people pass hair test screening when job offers or other prospects depend on it. But these can be risky without knowing the details. This article breaks down how hair drug tests work, what impacts their accuracy, techniques some try for passing them, and essential safety considerations if you need to take one.
A hair follicle test is one of the most accurate ways to check for drug use, even months ago, depending on hair length. Testing labs analyze a hair sample to see if any drug chemical traces reveal past use. Many employers and legal systems now use hair testing instead of faster-disappearing options. Hair tests spot patterns of repeated drug use for up to three months.
How Does a Hair Follicle Drug Test Work?
Here is the step-by-step process that happens:
First, the person getting tested gives a hair sample. Labs need only about 120 strands for the screenings. They take hair close to the scalp, where the newest growth happens.
Then, the lab prepares and processes the hairs to extract traces of chemicals that mark drug use. Common chemicals flagged include THC for marijuana, cocaine metabolites, opioids, amphetamines, etc.
Sophisticated lab screening looks for these substances and matches amounts to thresholds showing illegal, prescription, or excessive drug use. Results get carefully confirmed before final reporting.
The collected history can reveal if someone used a substance just once or more consistently, repeated use over many weeks. Hair tests catch long-term patterns that other screens on blood or urine samples miss.
Also read: Entrepreneurial Opportunity in the Drug Industry
Factors Affecting the Hair Follicle Drug Test Detection Window
Several variables impact how far back hair screening can unveil past substance use, including:
Hair Growth Rates: Head hair typically grows about 0.5 inches per month. Longer hair shows a broader history, while short hair growth sets detection limits. Standard screenings scan 1.5 inches in length.
Hair Color and Texture: Coarser, thicker hair retains more chemical traces than acceptable, thinner hair. Darker pigmentation also binds more chemicals, prolonging detectability compared to fair hair.
Frequency and Amount of Use: More sporadic or one-time use leaves more minor chemical traces than heavy, regular use, which deeply saturates hair, making substances appear more accessible.
Metabolism: The speed of individual metabolic functioning affects the absorption rates of substances into hair follicles, just like other drug tests. Faster metabolisms may process chemicals quicker.
Other External Factors: Hair chemical processing, such as dyeing, bleaching, perming, or keratin treatments, can remove some historical chemical traces, depending on the processing strength, if done after drug use but before testing dates.
Strategies for Passing a Hair Follicle Drug Test
If you need to pass an upcoming new job screening or court-ordered assessment, several approaches exist to address hair tests. Some aim to reduce chemical traces stored over time so that the results are clean. But take care, as some options have risks or laws prohibiting interference. If you are concerned about the need to pass a hair follicle test, speak to a medical professional for guidance. Take care, as some options have risks or laws prohibiting interference. Strategies people try include:
Abstinence: Completely avoiding all substances with detection windows dating back 90 days, depending on hair length, gives the best chance to pass. But longer-term users risk high.
Detoxification: Some take prescription-strength drug removal products, which claim to cleanse hair follicles internally and decrease traces in newly growing strands. Research validity carefully before making any attempts.
Shaving Body Hair: Shaving off all body hair removes the possibility of specimen removal but raises red flags, failing most pre-employment screening criteria. The hair quantities are also tiny, so shaving is unnecessary.
Chemical Processing: Bleaching and dying head hair or chemical straightening several times might reduce metabolite levels somewhat in grown strands. But labs test washout procedures before analysis. Harsh processing also clearly and visibly damages the hair sampled.
Products and Home Remedies: Various special shampoos and cleansing treatments sold online claim to remove external contaminants or internally detoxify below the skin. However, no robust data supports them yet, and most don’t achieve enough washout before testing dates at continuous growth rates.
Alternative Hair Sources: Providing hair specimens taken from various body parts that do not correspond to head hair growth rates risks detection, and dishonest accusations jeopardize opportunities. Dishonesty often causes automatic failures.
Legal Issues: Tampering with specimens risks instant test failures and active prosecutions in some jurisdictions for attempting screening interference or fraud of severe assessments. Know the laws applicable to individual cases based on testing organizations. Perjury punishments are also possible for court-ordered tests.
Important Hair Testing Considerations
Beyond passing techniques, several additional factors matter when facing screenings:
Local Legality: Understand laws in your state regarding required specimen collection rules and methods companies can use to check for intoxication so rights get protected. Discrimination is prohibited even in legal states for medical or recreational cannabis uses.
Avoiding False Positives: Certain hair treatments, health conditions, or prescriptions can influence results occasionally flagging harmless substances, so request secondary confirmation methods and share upfront if applicable to rule out errors.
Seeking Professional Consultations: Speak to legal and medical experts familiar with drug testing nuances and methods for contextual insights on case specifics, risks unique to you, and personalized counsel staying on the right side of the justice system. Having support assists enormously navigating high-stakes assessments.
Preparation Timelines: Hair tests reveal long histories, so standard detoxification or masking approaches fail when given little heads-up warning compared to passing faster urine screenings. Timelines thus determine realistic chances, typically requiring a minimum of 60-90 sensitivity-free days.
Alternative Specimens: Rare medical conditions genuinely preventing head hair growth may require coordinating with testing organizations around alternative specimen types that meet verification needs, like body hair samples per established policy accommodations. Upfront, transparent discussions prevent assumption issues.
Avoiding Hair Treatments Beforehand: Chemically processing hair close to testing dates poses problems if labs suspect attempts to hide results since treatments strip away traces from recent use that may be revealed if Scalp strands are sampled instead. Keep hair untreated for 90 days at a minimum beforehand.
Conclusion
Hair follicle drug testing constitutes some of the most accurate yet controversial analyses. Methods given the expansive detection periods reached assessing historical chemical use and outsiders inability to validate claims on passed or failed checks. Technological limitations on ensuring genuine rather than tampered with samples further complicate debates. However, improved regulations, scientific advances, and ethical standards alignments continue evolving hair testing validity, accessibility, and privacy. Commit to the self-work first, clearing minds and bodies moving forward if unable to flee the shadows of past decisions projected through intrusive inspection methods. The rest follows progress, staying present. Things get brighter gradually if we walk toward the light rather than losing way and staring back.